Multiple organizations selling the same parking

This is primarily a consortium question.  We have a group consisting of the Performing arts center and three resident companies.  The parking garage at the center is shared by everyone.  We are in the process of building the parking facility in Tessitura and plan to use allocations to each organization to prevent overselling.

This is the first time we have tried to set up an event which will be sold by multiple organizations and we are running into a roadblock due to the Business Unit settings in TR_SEASON_TYPE.

Currently we have one Season Type for each organization with the Business Unit for that organization assigned to it.  I'm assuming the answer here is to create a new business unit to contain these parking sales, but I'm not at all sure how to allow users across multiple organizations access to it.

I know plenty of organizations out there have sold tickets from box offices in multiple organizations.  Any help is appreciated.

  • Levi,

     

    We have parking set up as a season by itself and the season it not control grouped.  All organizations then have access to the price types for parking.  We only have one business unit created, it’s been that way since I got here and it hasn’t been changed.  We don’t use allocations for parking, everyone sells from the same performance and facility and we haven’t had an issue with anything overselling.  So far everything seems to be working for us.

     

    If you need more detail, you know how to get a hold of me.

     

    Teresa

     

    From: Tessitura Ticketing Forum [mailto:forums-ticketing@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Levi Sauerbrei
    Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 7:38 AM
    To: Teresa Dean
    Subject: [Tessitura Ticketing Forum] Multiple organizations selling the same parking

     

    This is primarily a consortium question.  We have a group consisting of the Performing arts center and three resident companies.  The parking garage at the center is shared by everyone.  We are in the process of building the parking facility in Tessitura and plan to use allocations to each organization to prevent overselling.

    This is the first time we have tried to set up an event which will be sold by multiple organizations and we are running into a roadblock due to the Business Unit settings in TR_SEASON_TYPE.

    Currently we have one Season Type for each organization with the Business Unit for that organization assigned to it.  I'm assuming the answer here is to create a new business unit to contain these parking sales, but I'm not at all sure how to allow users across multiple organizations access to it.

    I know plenty of organizations out there have sold tickets from box offices in multiple organizations.  Any help is appreciated.




    This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Ticketing Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Ticketing forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!

  • Hi Levi,

     

    I’m pretty sure most consortiums don’t use business units to segregate things, in part because of challenges like this.  Control groups offer much more flexibility.

     

    Everything in a transaction must have the same business unit.  That means the season, the payment methods, and the batch.  So the only way to make this work would be to set up a new batch type and new payment methods that are in a business unit everyone can access, then to sell the parking an operator would have to hold their batch, switch to a parking batch, and go back into the ticket order screen to complete the parking order.  With control groups, though, you could just create a new control group and mode of sale that all orgs have access to, and all an operator would have to do to sell parking would be switch the mode of sale.

     

    Kevin Sheehan

    Senior Documentation & Learning Resources Specialist

    Tessitura Network

    +1 888 643 5778 x 329

    ksheehan@tessituranetwork.com

     

  • Kevin,

     

    Thanks for the info.  I was afraid that would be the answer.  I inherited the 4 BU setup.  So if I'm understanding the optimal solution, I should blow up all the Business Units (which entails updating all historical contribution and ticket order records along with all payment methods, funds, etc). And leave everything in a generic BU.

    Anybody got a script that will take care of all that for me? :)

  • Ideally, yes, you should just have one business unit.  Before you start changing things around, I suggest opening a help ticket.  Playing around with business units can be tricky, and support can help steer you through any potential problems.

     

    Kevin Sheehan

    Senior Documentation & Learning Resources Specialist

    Tessitura Network

    +1 888 643 5778 x 329

    ksheehan@tessituranetwork.com

     

  • Thanks Kevin,

    I've opened a ticket already. As with all major projects, it seems that the deadline for this is already upon me :)


    --
    Levi Sauerbrei


    On Jun 28, 2011, at 8:42 AM, "Kevin Sheehan" <bounce-kevinsheehan4372@tessituranetwork.com> wrote:

    Ideally, yes, you should just have one business unit.  Before you start changing things around, I suggest opening a help ticket.  Playing around with business units can be tricky, and support can help steer you through any potential problems.

     

    Kevin Sheehan

    Senior Documentation & Learning Resources Specialist

    Tessitura Network

    +1 888 643 5778 x 329

    ksheehan@tessituranetwork.com

     




    This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Ticketing Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Ticketing forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!
  • Thank you all for the answers.  And support has been very helpful as well.  Follow up question as I work through some of these changes in Test tonight.

    In places where a business unit is not strictly required (i.e. TR_BATCH_TYPE) is a NULL acceptable?  Or would that cause problems somewhere in the process?

     

    Thanks again all!

  • Former Member
    Former Member $organization

    Hi Levi

    We just have the one BU, and all of our batches have that set – apart from anything else, I’d tend to avoid NULLs wherever possible, given their propensity to confuse people.

    But the notes on  tr_batch_type do say :

    BU = Business Unit for this batch.  If this is blank, then a batch can be mixed business units.

             If this is filled in, (from TR_BU) then the entire batch can only contain transactions from

             this business unit

    So I guess the implication is that NULLs are ok, in this case, at least???

     

    ________________________________
    Ken McSwain

    Systems and Technology Manager

    Australian Chamber Orchestra

     

    ken.mcswain@aco.com.au

    Ph   +61 2 8274 3833 ::  Mob +61 418 659 360 :: Fax  +61 2 9274 3801

    PO Box R21, Royal Exchange NSW 1225

    2 East Circular Quay, Sydney NSW 2000

     

    From: Tessitura Ticketing Forum [mailto:forums-ticketing@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Levi Sauerbrei
    Sent: Thursday, 7 July 2011 11:31
    To: Ken McSwain
    Subject: Re: [Tessitura Ticketing Forum] Multiple organizations selling the same parking

     

    Thank you all for the answers.  And support has been very helpful as well.  Follow up question as I work through some of these changes in Test tonight.

    In places where a business unit is not strictly required (i.e. TR_BATCH_TYPE) is a NULL acceptable?  Or would that cause problems somewhere in the process?

     

    Thanks again all!

    From: Levi Sauerbrei <bounce-levisauerbrei8271@tessituranetwork.com>
    Sent: 6/28/2011 8:48:43 AM

    Thanks Kevin,

     

    I've opened a ticket already. As with all major projects, it seems that the deadline for this is already upon me :)

     

    --

    Levi Sauerbrei

     


    On Jun 28, 2011, at 8:42 AM, "Kevin Sheehan" <bounce-kevinsheehan4372@tessituranetwork.com> wrote:

    Ideally, yes, you should just have one business unit.  Before you start changing things around, I suggest opening a help ticket.  Playing around with business units can be tricky, and support can help steer you through any potential problems.

     

    Kevin Sheehan

    Senior Documentation & Learning Resources Specialist

    Tessitura Network

    +1 888 643 5778 x 329

    ksheehan@tessituranetwork.com

     




    This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Ticketing Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Ticketing forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!




    This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Ticketing Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Ticketing forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!


    Hear Australia's Stradivarius violin in the Baroque Virtuosi tour (3-14 July).
    Explore the ACO&#x02019;s 2011 season at aco.com.au/season2011

    This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by return email and delete the document. The ACO is not responsible for any changes made to a document other than those made by the ACO or for the effect of the changes on the document's meaning. The ACO accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses interference, interception, corruption or unauthorised access.