Hi all,
It was just discovered that there are a few transactions in transcend from each departmentthat ended up getting authorized but have been stuck in limbo with a transaction status of tran.held.pending.
There is no pattern to these that I can see other then some fall within the same date.
I've got an email in to our IT provider who set transcend up but thought I would see if anyone else has run into a similar problem.
Cheers!
I have seen this before…we still get them once in a while
--Richard
From: Tessitura Technical Forum [mailto:forums-technical@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Rowell Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:37 PM To: Richard Glass Subject: [Tessitura Technical Forum] Transcend Held/Pending Auths
It was just discovered that there are a few transactions in transcend from each department that ended up getting authorized but have been stuck in limbo with a transaction status of tran.held.pending.
This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Technical Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Technical forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!
You might try looking at the “Incomplete Credit Card Transactions” report to see if there’s any correlation. Did you upgrade Transcend recently? There’s a glitch that a recent upgrade fixes, but the fix caused this error for us at one point.
Kirk Mortensen Database Administrator
tel: 650-463-7122 fax: 650-463-1963 kirk@theatreworks.org
“SPELLBINDING… PURE MAGIC” - Chicago Sun Times
THE CHOSEN by Aaron Posner and Chaim Potok October 7 - November 1 Mountain View Center for the Performing Arts
From: Tessitura Technical Forum [mailto:forums-technical@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Rowell Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:37 PM To: Kirk Mortensen Subject: [Tessitura Technical Forum] Transcend Held/Pending Auths
I am not 100% postitive on this, but I think this is what happens when a user authorizes a card and then cancels the order/contribution. First the card is authorized, and then when you hit done transcend is told to actually include the transaction in that day's batch. If you hit cancel you are left with just the authorization and transcend is never told to settle it.
We used to get this a lot more with Supercharge than we have with Transcend. When it happened here it was usually due to an AVS fail, so you may want to check in your Transcend setup that it is configured not to hold transactions for failed AVS. We still get the occasional auth that needs to be manually released for settlement. I've never been able to find a good reason why. We just know to check daily and make sure there aren't any, or if there are, look into it and either void it if it needs voiding or release it if it needs releasing.
Oh ok, so I just "release" them and they get settled. that's good.We didn't have this problem with supercharge and are still getting all the clients installed.For now I'll just check to ensure they are being settled.
Thanks everyone!
I now have a transaction on hold due to tessitura crashing that I don't want. I see that held transactions will expire eventually but is it best to release the transaction for settlement and then void it?
Any feelings on this?I hate keeping a patrons money locked up for no reason.
I would call Intrix to confirm just what to do in this situation. I have called our contact there a couple of times since going live to confirm what I am seeing/should be doing with strange looking transactions.
You could in theory leave it until it expired, however the hold on the person's card would still be there, and as far as I know, it'll expire after 30 days. So in the interim, if there was a "good" charge that went through for the transaction, as well as the stuck one, if the person checks their account they'll think they've been double charged. Based on my interaction with Intrix support, I'd void it.
Thanks all!
Intrix did suggest releasing the transaction and voiding it.