Today we’re gathering information about constituent telephone numbers and how they are used in your business. Thinking about constituent telephone numbers in your business…
What are some challenges that you have surrounding constituent phones today?
Are there trends you are seeing that could impact phone functionality in the future?
What do you like about telephone functionality in existing Tessitura?
What would you like to see changed/improved about telephone functionality?
Any other thoughts about phones, your business, and Tessitura?
Keep in mind that this may be more than just thinking about the storage and retrieval of telephone numbers. Try to think overall about how your business interacts with people via phone and how you might expect Next Gen to enable this interaction.
Thanks!
Andrew
All,
In the area of phone numbers and addresses and names. It would be great if the WEB API provided a few more sanity checks of the data going into the system.
Here is a story based on a hoped for future state.
Scott a Telephone Ticketing Services manager was very happy when the Next Gen Tessitura Web API went in place because it had a facility to apply sanity check rules on name, address and phone information provided by customers though the Web API. Prior to Tessitura Next Gen Scott’s team spent on average spent one hour a day manually correcting addresses put in by web site users. In general web site users were not capitalizing their names and street address components. They also had a bad habit of adding extra non-white spaces to their names. They added things like <TAB> and <CHR LF> that caused formatting problems for outgoing postal mail with tickets and memberships.
--Tom
From: Tessitura Next Generation Forum [mailto:forums-nextgeneration@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Suzanne Bridger Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 7:27 AM To: Thomas Brown Subject: RE: [Tessitura Next Generation Forum] Telephones...
With all the different ways that UK numbers can be formatted, we ask our staff not to include any spaces at all. So 0208 123 4567 should be input as 02081234567.
It would be good if there was an option for Tess. to automatically take out any spaces on save. That way you could identify the duplicates that Chuck mentions.
www.glyndebourne.com
P Please don't print this email unless you really need to.
Glyndebourne Productions Ltd is a charity, registered number 243877
Glyndebourne Productions Ltd is a limited company registered in England and Wales.
Registered number: 00358266. Registered office: Glyndebourne, LEWES, Sussex BN8 5UU
Please note that Glyndebourne Productions Ltd may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security and staff training.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for forums-nextgeneration@tessituranetwork.com. If you are not forums-nextgeneration@tessituranetwork.com you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify suzanne.bridger@glyndebourne.com immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Suzanne Bridger therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Glyndebourne Productions Ltd unless specifically stated.
From: Tessitura Next Generation Forum [mailto:forums-nextgeneration@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Katie Garvin Sent: 05 February 2010 14:12 To: Suzanne Bridger Subject: Re: [Tessitura Next Generation Forum] Telephones...
Absolutely - UK numbers are formatted in different ways e.g. depending on area, so there is no one mask that suits all.
From: Chuck Reif <bounce-chuckreif3941@tessituranetwork.com> Sent: 2/3/2010 8:07:39 PM
It's an interesting question--how do you reconcile the fact that many people say that phones numbers should be removed from addresses and the need to format phone numbers? And as Peter points out, it's not just at the country level where phone numbers need formatting. And don't get me started on UK phone number formatting!
If you do it at the phone type level then you end up with duplicate types (mobile formatted, mobile unformatted, etc.) Or maybe phone number formatting is just a take it or leave it proposition--You get one mask per installation which you can override on a per-number basis. Either enter the number according to the site's mask or hit some control and enter that number free form. (Or make the site's mask free form and then all phone numbers would be that way.)
Thoughts?
You were sent this message automatically by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Next Generation forum email notifications. You may reply to this message or visit the site to reply to the post above. If replying via email, please consider deleting the previous message text before sending to help with readability on the site. Thank you!
I don't mean to dilute any of the great stuff in this thread so far on the complexities of telephone numbers, but I do want to draw attention to the fact that telephone numbers are only one example of the more general category of "Media of communication." In fact, for many people, a mobile phone represents not one but two different media of communication - a voice channel and a separate text channel. I know numbers of people who have grown deeply reluctant to speak on a mobile phone and use it almost exclusively as a text exchanger. Some have even descended to a ring of the abyss within which they will only communicate with anyone through Twitter. The not very distant future contains more of this sort of thing.
Because communication technology and use of it is subject to considerable change during the next few decades, I believe thought should be given to a generic view of media of communication. Any constituent could be associated with any number of media of communication. Each constituent would be empowered to record preferences for what kinds of communications he or she wants to receive through which media.
Each medium of communication would be specified as either real time (e.g. telephone call, video conference, knocking on a door) or message based (e.g. postal mail, email, tweet, facebook fan page). I know these categories have started to blur, a phone call may turn into a message leaving opportunity for example; but recording whether a particular medium is primarily for real time or message based communication would still be useful information to many potential applications.
Each medium would have a specified addressing element, several of them potentially as complicated as the whole telephone number format issue being discussed elsewhere in this thread. We've gotten away very easily on email addresses so far. Addresses that include other-than-roman character sets are likely to be issues for Tessitura users during the life of this product.
Each medium would have specified capabilities, for example does the medium convey sound, text, static imagery, video, moving holography?
Each medium would have a specified reach, basically is it a one to one medium like a phone call or is it a one to many medium like a facebook fan page.
Recognizing these specifications, postal address, telephone number, email address, twitter address, and many new media yet to come are each potentially important ways to communicate to constituents. While each one has special characteristics, mostly to do with addressing and capabilities, any constituent should be able to have any number of any of them and be capable of defining what sorts of communications during what time periods he or she wants to receive through which media.
Pete is on to something critical. As Pete points out, today we are using cell phone addresses with two very different means of communication, calls and text/sms.
It all boils down to an address and one or more means of communication via that address. Thinking of it broadly in these terms helps to future-proof the system and ensure we are accommodating all needs.
This even has implications for Search and Lists/Extractions. The ability to search by 'address' -- whether it is a physical, email, twitter, or some other type of address, unifies searching. For lists/extractions, once you determine "who" is on a list, you can then specify the means of communication, and pull any/all "addresses" for that list that are appropriate for that means of communication (and that the customer has indicated should be used for various purposes).