Contact Preferences / Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation Question

Hi all,

My apologies to anyone getting multiple instances of this email!  I have posted to several different forums.

Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation is changing next month, and in order to better comply with the legislation, we at Harbourfront Centre in Toronto are considering changing the way we log our contact preferences and restrictions.  I am hoping for advice on a couple of issues:

A)  I am wondering if anyone out there (anywhere in the world) uses mail and email purposes to indicate opt-ins and opt-outs?
Up until now, we've used the contact restrictions fields in the general tab, as well as some attributes, to record contact restrictions, so I am familiar with how these work, but we are currently looking for ways to link opt-ins and opt-outs to specific email addresses, rather than to the constituent in general.

B)  Specific to Canada, I am wondering whether other Canadian organizations are getting the express consent required by the legislation on a per email address basis, or on a per constituent basis?  If it is per email address, how will you be recording this in Tessitura?   We plan to incorporate Wordfly into our system, but still need to figure out how to handle a fair degree of opt-in / opt-out complexity, as we have 4 distinct organizations using Tessitura, all under the Harbourfront Centre umbrella.

Any input would be much appreciated.

Thank you!  Catherine
  • Catherine,

     

    We are thinking about moving to Mail and Email purposes as you describe.  However we have not done so yet.  This would take some changes to our web site, operational procedures in Sales, Membership, and Marketing Groups.

     

    --Tom

    718.724.8135

    tbrown@BAM.org

     

    From: Tessitura Development Forum [mailto:forums-development@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Catherine Goodwin
    Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:39 PM
    To: Thomas Brown
    Subject: [Tessitura Development Forum] Contact Preferences / Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation Question

     

    Hi all,

    My apologies to anyone getting multiple instances of this email!  I have posted to several different forums.

    Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation is changing next month, and in order to better comply with the legislation, we at Harbourfront Centre in Toronto are considering changing the way we log our contact preferences and restrictions.  I am hoping for advice on a couple of issues:

    A)  I am wondering if anyone out there (anywhere in the world) uses mail and email purposes to indicate opt-ins and opt-outs?
    Up until now, we've used the contact restrictions fields in the general tab, as well as some attributes, to record contact restrictions, so I am familiar with how these work, but we are currently looking for ways to link opt-ins and opt-outs to specific email addresses, rather than to the constituent in general.

    B)  Specific to Canada, I am wondering whether other Canadian organizations are getting the express consent required by the legislation on a per email address basis, or on a per constituent basis?  If it is per email address, how will you be recording this in Tessitura?   We plan to incorporate Wordfly into our system, but still need to figure out how to handle a fair degree of opt-in / opt-out complexity, as we have 4 distinct organizations using Tessitura, all under the Harbourfront Centre umbrella.

    Any input would be much appreciated.

    Thank you!  Catherine




    This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Development Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Development forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!

  • Yes!  We'll have to work through the website and operational issues if we make this change.  Btw, I have heard (offline) from another organization that does this, and reports that it works very well.  The only downside they mention is that phone restrictions must be tracked in another way.

    Thanks.

    On 6/10/2014 4:23 PM, Tom Brown wrote:

    Catherine,

     

    We are thinking about moving to Mail and Email purposes as you describe.  However we have not done so yet.  This would take some changes to our web site, operational procedures in Sales, Membership, and Marketing Groups.

     

    --Tom

    718.724.8135

    tbrown@BAM.org

     

    From: Tessitura Development Forum [mailto:forums-development@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Catherine Goodwin
    Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:39 PM
    To: Thomas Brown
    Subject: [Tessitura Development Forum] Contact Preferences / Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation Question

     

    Hi all,

    My apologies to anyone getting multiple instances of this email!  I have posted to several different forums.

    Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation is changing next month, and in order to better comply with the legislation, we at Harbourfront Centre in Toronto are considering changing the way we log our contact preferences and restrictions.  I am hoping for advice on a couple of issues:

    A)  I am wondering if anyone out there (anywhere in the world) uses mail and email purposes to indicate opt-ins and opt-outs?
    Up until now, we've used the contact restrictions fields in the general tab, as well as some attributes, to record contact restrictions, so I am familiar with how these work, but we are currently looking for ways to link opt-ins and opt-outs to specific email addresses, rather than to the constituent in general.

    B)  Specific to Canada, I am wondering whether other Canadian organizations are getting the express consent required by the legislation on a per email address basis, or on a per constituent basis?  If it is per email address, how will you be recording this in Tessitura?   We plan to incorporate Wordfly into our system, but still need to figure out how to handle a fair degree of opt-in / opt-out complexity, as we have 4 distinct organizations using Tessitura, all under the Harbourfront Centre umbrella.

    Any input would be much appreciated.

    Thank you!  Catherine




    This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Development Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Development forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!




    This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Development Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Development forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!
  • Hi Catherine,

    I don't know if you saw the latest clarifications on CASL:

    http://www.imaginecanada.ca/node/2799

    http://www.imaginecanada.ca/node/2800