ADA Changes and Best Available Seating

We are working on enhancing our website for the upcoming changes to the ADA.  We have SYOS covered thanks to the new "Reserve Held Seats" option for T_DEFAULTS with V10, which now works with ReserveTicketsSpecifiedSeats and that we use holds for wheelchair seats.

Initially we decided we would only enhance the SYOS ticketing path, but we have situations where we deliberately disable SYOS due to volumes, leaving Best Available as the only option.  The problem is that while ReserveTicketsEx allows the parameter for special requests, wheelchair being one of them, that will not work for held seats.

Has anyone done anything dealing with wheelchair seats and Best Available?

Thank you in advance.

Paul

Parents
  • Chuck, can you provide any additional detail as to what these changes will offer? We are about to launch our accessible ticketing features on our website, including SYOS as well as best available, and it would be great to know how these new capabilities may help extend the limits of what is possible.

    Thanks!

    Alan

    On Apr 14, 2011, at 6:56 PM, "Chuck Reif" > wrote:


    Just a quick update on this topic from the Development department. We have recently made some changes to the Best Seating algorithm to better accommodate some of the new rules. This is in review and testing now and that will continue for a few weeks. We'll send an email out when we're finished which will include instructions on how you can add this to v10.
    From: Rosa Alvarez >
    Sent: 4/14/2011 3:43:23 PM
    Thank you so much!

    From: Tessitura Web Forum [mailto:forums-tessitura-web@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Danielle Heller
    Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:11 PM
    To: rosaa2@u.washington.edu
    Subject: Re: [Tessitura Web Forum] ADA Changes and Best Available Seating


    Oh gosh, my pictures didn't show.

    When you first click our ticket link, you get this:

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/Evilbunnie127/Tessi/pricezone.png

    And then after 'best available', this:

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/Evilbunnie127/Tessi/pricetype.png



    ~The username is from high school - please don't judge me.
    From: Danielle Heller >
    Sent: 4/14/2011 3:00:17 PM

    Hi Rosa,

    I created price types and price zones in order to make our website the most user friendly. Our price types are now Student, Standard, and Accessible, and our price zones or sections are 'Orchestra Left' and 'Orchestra Left, accessible', etc.

    We do not use SYOS, but we do have Best Available, which is why I found creating a price zone along with price types to be the easiest for those using the website.

    Unfortunately we did not have the means to do anything fancy, so this had to come completely out of Tessitura and with the resources we already had.

    When you first click on our ticket link, you'll find a selection like this:Error! Filename not specified.



    If you click one of the accessible sections, you will only be given the accessible price type. But if you click the 'Best Available" option, you'll be given this:

    Error! Filename not specified.



    With the way our hall is set up, we are lucky enough that we did not have to change contiguity with our accessible seating. Since the Accessible price zones are only available with the accessible price type, we also did not have to update our best seat map.



    You were sent this email automatically because you subscribed to the Tessitura Web forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Web forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!



    You were sent this email automatically because you subscribed to the Tessitura Web forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Web forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!

    ________________________________

    This e-mail message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. This message may contain trade secrets, attorney-client communication, or other privileged and confidential information. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination, reproduction or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the Sender and delete the material from any computer.
  • What we're attempting to do is enhance the ability of the best seating system to seat both wheelchair locations and companion locations appropriately.  So in essence, the new procedure will look at the number of wheelchair location requests as compared to the total number of seats requested.  The difference between the two will be considered companion seats, which will be divided as equally as possible between the number of wheelchair location requests.  Then the process will select each wheelchair location (in normal best seating order) and then attempt to select that wheelchair location's companion seats as close as possible to the selected wheelchair location.  Calculating "close as possible" is done using both row and seat contiguity. 

    I can't get much more specific than that until we are through with development and testing.  But our goal is to both adhere to the spirit of the new regs which call for being able to accommodate best seat requests in a like manner whether wheelchair locations are included or not, and to stay backward compatible with the existing best seating process.

  • Was this ever implemented? Did I miss the solution in another thread?

  • We implemented this internally for two reasons: 1) the accessible seating system in Tessitura wasn't going to be updated by the drop-dead deadline (um, March 15th, 2011) and 2) our interpretation and implementation of the rules was a little different to the direction that Tessitura went: namely that the 2nd and 3rd companion seats could be assigned from nearby wheelchair spaces.  That is to say, our layout typically looks like this (S: Standard, W: Wheelchair space, C: Companion seat):

    SSWCCWWCCWWCSS

    So someone asking for one Wheelchair and three other tickets would be entitled three companion spaces, but we would provide two Companion seats and one Wheelchair space, e.g.:

    SS[WCCW]WCCWWCSS

    To do this, I have had to divert online requests that include wheelchair spaces, and instead of using Best Seat API methods, I pull a custom table that matches wheelchair spaces in each venue with companion seats in order (set up by the box office manager), and run my own (rather complex) algorithm to generate a specific seat request (or identify that the request cannot be executed).

    --Gawain

Reply
  • We implemented this internally for two reasons: 1) the accessible seating system in Tessitura wasn't going to be updated by the drop-dead deadline (um, March 15th, 2011) and 2) our interpretation and implementation of the rules was a little different to the direction that Tessitura went: namely that the 2nd and 3rd companion seats could be assigned from nearby wheelchair spaces.  That is to say, our layout typically looks like this (S: Standard, W: Wheelchair space, C: Companion seat):

    SSWCCWWCCWWCSS

    So someone asking for one Wheelchair and three other tickets would be entitled three companion spaces, but we would provide two Companion seats and one Wheelchair space, e.g.:

    SS[WCCW]WCCWWCSS

    To do this, I have had to divert online requests that include wheelchair spaces, and instead of using Best Seat API methods, I pull a custom table that matches wheelchair spaces in each venue with companion seats in order (set up by the box office manager), and run my own (rather complex) algorithm to generate a specific seat request (or identify that the request cannot be executed).

    --Gawain

Children
No Data