Associations and Gender

Downunder a few of the sites have changed the relationship to the generic Parent, Sibling, Child as they considered the gender focus a bit old fashioned. I can’t see a problem with the combo suggested for AuntUncle/NieceNephew.

However, it might be worth asking the ESC just in case some sites we aren’t aware of find the gender stuff invaluable.

S.

It would be great to have some feedback on the use of gender in association links between individual constituents.  If you're familiar with the way associations work now, you may know that there is fairly elaborate code there to try to figure out the gender of both sides of the association and map the association types appropriately. 

Is this necessary, really?  Wouldn't Parent/Child or Sibling/Sibling work as well as Mother/Daughter, Father/Daughter, Mother/Son, Mother/Daughter and Sister/Brother, Sister/Sister, Brother/Sister, Brother/Brother?  Yes it gets a little tricky when you get into Uncles and Aunts, but maybe you just call that something like AuntUncle/NieceNephew.  Interestingly Facebook has worked hard to keep all their relationship modeling gender neutral.

Thoughts are always welcome!

You were sent this message automatically by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Next Generation forum email notifications. You may reply to this message or visit the site to reply to the post above. If replying via email, please consider deleting the previous message text before sending to help with readability on the site. Thank you!

Downunder a few of the sites have changed the relationship to the generic Parent, Sibling, Child as they considered the gender focus a bit old fashioned. I can’t see a problem with the combo suggested for AuntUncle/NieceNephew.

However, it might be worth asking the ESC just in case some sites we aren’t aware of find the gender stuff invaluable.

S.

It would be great to have some feedback on the use of gender in association links between individual constituents.  If you're familiar with the way associations work now, you may know that there is fairly elaborate code there to try to figure out the gender of both sides of the association and map the association types appropriately. 

Is this necessary, really?  Wouldn't Parent/Child or Sibling/Sibling work as well as Mother/Daughter, Father/Daughter, Mother/Son, Mother/Daughter and Sister/Brother, Sister/Sister, Brother/Sister, Brother/Brother?  Yes it gets a little tricky when you get into Uncles and Aunts, but maybe you just call that something like AuntUncle/NieceNephew.  Interestingly Facebook has worked hard to keep all their relationship modeling gender neutral.

Thoughts are always welcome!

You were sent this message automatically by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Next Generation forum email notifications. You may reply to this message or visit the site to reply to the post above. If replying via email, please consider deleting the previous message text before sending to help with readability on the site. Thank you!