NCOA Processing

Has anyone out there taken the leap and started using the new NCOA processing service with MBS? Or is anyone using the new export/import reports with other NCOA services?

Thanks,

Jonathan

Parents
  • We're starting to talk about getting this set up at the Science Museum...will let you know what we learn!  Do you have any specific questions?

  • We are starting to work this isue. We are hoping to use the Tessitura provided process of a January 15 2010 NCOA run.

    One of the issues I'm looking into is how to handel company names in Street2. Has anyone come to a conclusion on how to handel this situation.

    --Tom Brown
    IT Project Manager
    Brooklyn Academy of Music
    www.bam.org
    tbrown@bam.org

    ________________________________________
    From: Tessitura Marketing Forum [forums-marketing@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Beth Varro [bounce-elizabethvarro6946@tessituranetwork.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 11:31 AM
    To: Thomas Brown
    Subject: Re: [Tessitura Marketing Forum] NCOA Processing

    We're starting to talk about getting this set up at the Science Museum...will let you know what we learn! Do you have any specific questions?
    From: Jonathan Dickey
    Sent: 9/24/2009 9:30:59 PM

    Has anyone out there taken the leap and started using the new NCOA processing service with MBS? Or is anyone using the new export/import reports with other NCOA services?

    Thanks,

    Jonathan



    This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Marketing Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Marketing forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!
  • I am having a meeting today on exactly that topic.  We have company names in Opt. Address as well and it has caused some trouble with the import file. Specifically, while that field allows 55 characters, the import file format only allows 30. So in some cases that field is too big which is preventing import. We are not using MBS, but I am using the utility to get the addresses in and out.

    My suggestion for the company name at our location will be to add it to the second line of the salutation and leave the Opt. Address line blank unless it really is part of the address. 

     

    I'll let you know if anything comes out of our user group discussion today.

  • Tom Brown,

    Jon Slater of The Huntington Theatre here.  Thanks for speaking with me by telephone in December.  We are ready to take the plunge with MBS and hope to export a file tomorrow (1/29/10). 

    I was a little bit concerned earlier today when I noticed in the export utility an optional parameter of Include Address Types.  I am presuming that leaving this blank will only export the primary address?  In my case this would be about 250,000 records.  If leaving this blank exports ALL addresses then the quantity will be much higher and the process will be more expensive than we anticipate.  Have any thoughts on this???

    Thanks,

    Jon

     

  • Hi Jon,

    We just finished our first NCOA run with MBS (and overall things worked quite smoothly).  If anyone else wants to hear about our experiences we're happy to share.

    To answer your question about the Include Address Types parameter, if you leave it blank it exports all addresses on the record, not just the primary.  The utility does not, however, export Inactive addresses.

    Unknown said:

    Tom Brown,

    Jon Slater of The Huntington Theatre here.  Thanks for speaking with me by telephone in December.  We are ready to take the plunge with MBS and hope to export a file tomorrow (1/29/10). 

    I was a little bit concerned earlier today when I noticed in the export utility an optional parameter of Include Address Types.  I am presuming that leaving this blank will only export the primary address?  In my case this would be about 250,000 records.  If leaving this blank exports ALL addresses then the quantity will be much higher and the process will be more expensive than we anticipate.  Have any thoughts on this???

    Thanks,

    Jon

     

     

  • Former Member
    Former Member $organization in reply to Kjersten Schladetzky

    Hi, we are just starting our first NCOA run with MBS.  We only like to export primary address.  What is the best way to accomplish that?

    Best regards,

    Diana

     

     

  • I don't think you can since a primary address can be any address type.

     

    Marty

     

     

    From: Tessitura Marketing Forum [mailto:forums-marketing@tessituranetwork.com] On Behalf Of Diana Du
    Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:37 PM
    To: Martin A. Jones
    Subject: Re: [Tessitura Marketing Forum] RE: NCOA Processing

     

    Hi, we are just starting our first NCOA run with MBS.  We only like to export primary address.  What is the best way to accomplish that?

    Best regards,

    Diana

     

     

    From: Kjersten Schladetzky <bounce-kjerstenschladetzky7557@tessituranetwork.com>
    Sent: 1/28/2010 4:23:09 PM

    Hi Jon,

    We just finished our first NCOA run with MBS (and overall things worked quite smoothly).  If anyone else wants to hear about our experiences we're happy to share.

    To answer your question about the Include Address Types parameter, if you leave it blank it exports all addresses on the record, not just the primary.  The utility does not, however, export Inactive addresses.

    Jon Slater:

    Tom Brown,

    Jon Slater of The Huntington Theatre here.  Thanks for speaking with me by telephone in December.  We are ready to take the plunge with MBS and hope to export a file tomorrow (1/29/10). 

    I was a little bit concerned earlier today when I noticed in the export utility an optional parameter of Include Address Types.  I am presuming that leaving this blank will only export the primary address?  In my case this would be about 250,000 records.  If leaving this blank exports ALL addresses then the quantity will be much higher and the process will be more expensive than we anticipate.  Have any thoughts on this???

    Thanks,

    Jon

     

     




    This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Marketing Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Marketing forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!

  • Former Member
    Former Member $organization in reply to Marty Jones

    Yes, after reviewing the documentation and the NCOA utility, it does not appear to be a straight forward way to export only primary address, so I am trying to figure out the best work-around.

  • I really can't think of anything, but I'll let you know if any brilliant ideas pop into my head. 

    Something to bear in mind if you do find a way to export only primary addresses: If your users run any of the Labels and Letters reports to generate a list of addresses for a mailing and use Mailing Date, Mailing Purpose, etc... they will probably pull addresses other than just the Primary Address and you won't necessarily be NCOA compliant.  Here at the museum we inactivate addresses we know are bad and that saves a bit on the cost of the NCOA processing.

    Unknown said:

    Yes, after reviewing the documentation and the NCOA utility, it does not appear to be a straight forward way to export only primary address, so I am trying to figure out the best work-around.

     

  • Shellie Sullivan with the Kansas City Repertory Theatre.  I would be very interested in hearing about your experience with NCOA.  I am getting ready to begin this process and we are also using MBS.  I'd be very appreciative of any advice you'd be willing to share including things to watch out for, potential problems, issues you ran into, etc. 

    We are doing the phone update as well.  Did you also have MBS do this for you?  Did you do any tweaking of the standard code behind the scenes (for instance, to select only the primary addresses?)

    Thanks for your wilingness to share your experiences concerning NCOA!

    Shellie

  • One other thing I forgot to put in my last post, concerns the problems that Science Museum of  Minnesota encountered with the Opt address being wiped out.  Does the NCOA process actually delete old addresses - or does it rather just inactivate them and keep them in history?  I was thinking I could possibly pull the Opt Address field back in after I've run the process.    Thanks again for any information.

    Shellie Sullivan

    Kansas City Rep Theatre

  • Unknown said:

     Does the NCOA process actually delete old addresses - or does it rather just inactivate them and keep them in history?  I was thinking I could possibly pull the Opt Address field back in after I've run the process.    Thanks again for any information.

    Shellie Sullivan

    Kansas City Rep Theatre

    The NCOA utility overwrites the address.  It does not create a new address and inactivate the old one.  However you can still see the old address in the audit trail (go to Transactions and select the Audit radio button).

     

Reply
  • Unknown said:

     Does the NCOA process actually delete old addresses - or does it rather just inactivate them and keep them in history?  I was thinking I could possibly pull the Opt Address field back in after I've run the process.    Thanks again for any information.

    Shellie Sullivan

    Kansas City Rep Theatre

    The NCOA utility overwrites the address.  It does not create a new address and inactivate the old one.  However you can still see the old address in the audit trail (go to Transactions and select the Audit radio button).

     

Children
  • This is a concern.  I know SQL well enough, I'm thinking I could create a table to store constituents with the optional address field along with the account id.  Then after I do the processing of the import data I could possibly pull these fields back in to the optional address field from my table based on the account id. 

    I totally LOVE your advice about bringing this into TEST first.  That will be a great place for a trial run of this.  I'd feel better if the addresses were being made inactive - rather than overwritten.  All the more reason for doing the TEST run first.  Thanks so much for your help. 

  • Hi Shellie,

    In addition to the technical stuff that Kjersten mentioned, we found it necessary to do careful planning around business rules before we ran anything.  If you or someone else at your org would like to talk details about that, I'd be happy to help.  Might be easier over the phone; feel free to call me at 651-265-9829.

    Beth

    * * * * *
    Omnifest 2010 brings five giant screen films to the Omnitheater for six short weeks from January 29 through March 11. Members see it free! View this year's films and trailers at www.smm.org/omnifest.

    The Dead Sea Scrolls: Words That Changed the World exhibition opens March 12. Witness authentic 2,000-year-old manuscripts, including the earliest biblical writings. Spiritually significant. Scientifically stunning. Visit www.smm.org/scrolls.

    Elizabeth A Varro
    Membership Manager
    Science Museum of Minnesota
    (651) 265-9829

    ----- "Shellie Sullivan" <bounce-shelliesullivan9778@tessituranetwork.com> wrote:
    | From: "Shellie Sullivan" <bounce-shelliesullivan9778@tessituranetwork.com>
    | To: bvarro@smm.org
    | Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 3:32:01 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
    | Subject: Re: [Tessitura Marketing Forum] RE: NCOA Processing
    |
    |

    This is a concern.  I know SQL well enough, I'm thinking I could create a table to store constituents with the optional address field along with the account id.  Then after I do the processing of the import data I could possibly pull these fields back in to the optional address field from my table based on the account id. 

    I totally LOVE your advice about bringing this into TEST first.  That will be a great place for a trial run of this.  I'd feel better if the addresses were being made inactive - rather than overwritten.  All the more reason for doing the TEST run first.  Thanks so much for your help. 

    |
    |

    From: Kjersten Schladetzky <bounce-kjerstenschladetzky7557@tessituranetwork.com>
    | Sent: 2/25/2010 2:59:38 PM
    |

    Shellie Sullivan:

     Does the NCOA process actually delete old addresses - or does it rather just inactivate them and keep them in history?  I was thinking I could possibly pull the Opt Address field back in after I've run the process.    Thanks again for any information.

    Shellie Sullivan

    Kansas City Rep Theatre

    |

    The NCOA utility overwrites the address.  It does not create a new address and inactivate the old one.  However you can still see the old address in the audit trail (go to Transactions and select the Audit radio button).

     

    |

    |
    |
    | This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Marketing Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Marketing forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!
  • Thanks so much, Beth.  I will probably take you up on your offer and give you a call next week.  I appreciate your willingness to take the time to talk to me.  Thanks!

  • Beth, 

    I'm wondering how long the process took you to run.  I'm assuming you did this when your box office was closed?

  • Hi Shellie,

    I can answer this one.  We have just over 400,000 records and it took about 30 minutes to process the changes from the staging table into the records themselves.  We did do it afterhours when the box office and call center were closed.  For fun, when we ran the update in our Stage system we tried to process some transactions at the same time and didn't have any trouble but did notice that the system was a bit sluggish so we felt safer making the changes when we weren't helping customers.

    Kjersten

    Unknown said:

    Beth, 

    I'm wondering how long the process took you to run.  I'm assuming you did this when your box office was closed?