I'm curious to see if anyone has any tips for best practices when using the "priority" drop-down in plans. Our team is working on weekly reporting using the Major Gifts portfolio in a way that ensures that no donors are overlooked and that everyone is receiving the correct amount of attention.
If you are using priorities to track donors, what are your strategies for assigning low, medium, high, etc...?
Thanks!
Hi Montez,
This was part of my presentation at TLCC2018 – Adv Analytics for Development (Reports). At Kansas City Ballet, we use a 0-8 point system made up of 2 scales to assign priorities. I will let you know that it took many discussions and time collaborating with the Development Team to get these priorities in place. My team has weekly donor/prospect meetings to discuss those at particular levels – discussing whether their priority rating should change as well as what contacts/meetings have been made with each person. It really helps identify a process. Maybe this or something like this will work for you?
Our priorities drop down looks like this:
0 - Access/Affinity
1 - Access/Affinity
2 - Access/Affinity, etc
Scale Ratings:
Thanks,
Marie
---
Marie F. Kocher | Development Operations & Data Specialist
Kansas City Ballet | Todd Bolender Center for Dance & Creativity
500 W. Pershing Road, Kansas City, MO 64108
816.216.5582 (D) | 816.931.2232 x1382 (O) | 816.931.1172 (fax)
www.kcballet.org
Thank you, Marie. This is very helpful! I was thinking that it might be time to expand those options a bit.