I am looking for help in associating campaigns to funds. I want to avoid creating too many funds, so I'm using our basic over-arching categories and keeping them as perpetual funds (General Support, Musician Chair Endowment, Youth Orchstra, etc.) to be associated with campaigns each year (2010 Supporters, 2010 Friends, etc). I know that there can't be overlapping dates when I associate funds with campaigns. So what do I do when we have multiple campaigns that feed into the same general fund category? For example, we have some years when Friends, Supporters and Foundations (which we separate into different campaigns) all make gifts to support the Youth Orchestra. It seems silly to have three funds for the Youth Orchestra when all these gifts are going to the same pot of money for the same use and with the same GL codes. Is there any work-around?
Thanks,
Allison
Allison Groves | Fundraising ManagerNew Zealand Symphony OrchestraP +64 4 801 2044F +64 4 801 7887E AllisonG@nzso.co.nz
www.nzso.co.nz
Hi Allison,
I had the same issue when banking donations to a fund that was coinciding with an Elevated Event (essentially another Campaign). Please see here for the thread: http://www.tessituranetwork.com/Community/forums/p/10515/32607.aspx#32607
My work around was manually disassociating then reassociating the fund from one campaign to another depending on the donor’s response and intent. I would bank one donation, hold the batch, disassociate then reassociate the fund from one campaign to another, re-open the batch and bank the donation. Surprisingly this way sticks when closing the batch of donations.
Just be mindful that this may affect your web donations and the campaign it’s tied to if you are associating and disassociating between multiple campaigns.
Hope this helps and all the best,
Katherine
Katherine ChienDevelopment Coordinator
MELBOURNE RECITAL CENTRE
Cnr Southbank Blvd and Sturt St, Southbank VIC 3006
T: +61 (0)3 9207 2664 | M: 0401 868 788
E: katherine.chien@melbournerecital.com.au
W: www.melbournerecital.com.au
From: Allison Groves [mailto:bounce-allisongroves1856@tessituranetwork.com] Sent: Friday, 14 March 2014 1:48 PMTo: Katherine ChienSubject: [Tessitura Development Forum] associating funds and campaigns
This message was sent automatically to you by www.tessituranetwork.com because you subscribed to the Tessitura Development Forum. You may reply to this message to post to the Development forum or visit the site to search, read and post to the forums. In the interest of keeping the forum posts from becoming cluttered, we encourage you to delete previous message text from your reply before sending. Thank you!
My work around was manually disassociating then re-associating the fund from one campaign to another depending on the donor’s response and intent. I would bank one donation, hold the batch, dis-associate then re-associate the fund from one campaign to another, re-open the batch and bank the donation. Surprisingly this way sticks when closing the batch of donations.
Katherine Chien
Development CoordinatorMelbourne Recital Centre
We have set up our funds the way you are trying to avoid -- each campaign has its own General Support fund and each fund has its own GL. Our Finance people like it broken out like this.
But all campaigns with General Support funds share the same designation called General Support so when we want to report out the total in General Support, we look at the designations.
This doesn't help with your request, but it's another way of handling this. I haven't seen any downsides to this.