Sensory Trigger Warnings

Hi everyone! We're currently in a bit of a dilemma as to whether to include sensory warnings (some loud sounds) for our percussion concerts. We'd like to be more transparent about what our audiences can expect in our concerts, but a few of my colleagues are worried that this may 'scare' away potential audience members – the argument here is that there are more quiet moments than loud ones. For context, these concerts are in a fairly small, intimate space. We will be providing earplugs and plan on communicating this.

I'd love to hear about everyone's thoughts on this, as well as your practice around trigger warnings and how you'd word/present the information so that it's representative of the experience? Thank you!

Parents
  • Hi Shenette, Chloe, Carlos and Heath,

    Thank you so much for your thoughtful replies! My apologies for leaving this thread for so long - we had a couple of urgent projects come up and had to put this conversation on hold for a bit, but I'm very glad to say we're slowly incorporating sensory information on our website (we've adapted the wording you've shared Heath, thank you!)

    We decided to go with the term "Sensory Information" and we've included a line to let patrons know they can contact us for more information about the program (thanks Chloe for this advice!) It's not perfect yet, but we do hope it's a step in the right direction.

    Our team did raise one more concern: as we start to provide sensory information consistently, we do worry that if we miss anything, we might be breaking our audience's trust in us. Of course, I am of the view that trying is definitely better than nothing, but what are your thoughts on this - have such situations come up for you?

Reply
  • Hi Shenette, Chloe, Carlos and Heath,

    Thank you so much for your thoughtful replies! My apologies for leaving this thread for so long - we had a couple of urgent projects come up and had to put this conversation on hold for a bit, but I'm very glad to say we're slowly incorporating sensory information on our website (we've adapted the wording you've shared Heath, thank you!)

    We decided to go with the term "Sensory Information" and we've included a line to let patrons know they can contact us for more information about the program (thanks Chloe for this advice!) It's not perfect yet, but we do hope it's a step in the right direction.

    Our team did raise one more concern: as we start to provide sensory information consistently, we do worry that if we miss anything, we might be breaking our audience's trust in us. Of course, I am of the view that trying is definitely better than nothing, but what are your thoughts on this - have such situations come up for you?

Children
  • This DEAI work is fragile. We are all learning as we go and sure to miss something along the way. Here in Raleigh, NC we have provided extensive details about one thing… and less about others. Only to go back to the drawing board again.  I do agree that it can send messaging to our guest that’s confusing so keeping several eyes on the shared info is awesome and helpful. You’re off to a fantastic start! 

  • Hi Anne, 

    I think your instinct is right here-- trying is definitely better than nothing! And the fact that you're trying so thoughtfully really does matter. As Shennette says: this is fragile work. Sometimes it takes time to get things right, and sometimes what feels most right changes-- that's ok. 

    Cheers,

    Sheila

  • These are great points.  DEAI work, as with all CRM is a constant conversation, commitment and practice, rather than a destination we will end up at. We provide informaton and updates and invite feedback through a variety of means to round out the dialogue.

    If you capture customer sentiment as CSIs, having a catagory that relates to this is great. Logging feedback from email, socials, customer service and House Services staff is a good way to capture what works, as is post even t surveys. Following up is a great way of building trust. 

  • Hey Anne,

    We went one step further with this as we were worried about the same thing.

    We created a 'sensory timeline' for our shows, example just below.

    0 mins – loud music, transition with rolling light

    1 min – loud singing

    10 mins – scream

    11 mins – shouting

    13 mins – loud music, transition with rolling light

    24 mins - transition with rolling light, music

    29 mins – loud singing

    30 & 38 mins - transition with rolling light, music

    38 mins – flashes of bright light reflected on guitar

    40 mins - shouting

    45 mins – noise of high five, transition with rolling light, music

    50 mins - transition with rolling light, music

    55 mins – shouting

    56 mins – smoking of herbal cigarette, smell of smoke

    57 mins - transition with rolling light, music

    67 mins – loud bang

    68 mins – blackout, applause

    The reason we did this is because we did a training session where someone brought up that if they see 'gunshot' on a content warning, for most of the show they are anxiously waiting for it.

    We do not have these readily available on our website, but they are available should anyone ask.

    These have also been helpful for our neurodiverse ushers and we take input from them and our CSMs to try and make sure they are as thorough as possible

    Our shows run for 7/8 weeks so it has not been too much trouble for us, I'm not sure how long your runs are, if they are shorter this would obviously be harder.

    All the best,

    Chloe

  • Thanks for this suggestion Chloe! Our concerts (classical music performances) are usually one-off programs, but we can most definitely flag specific pieces rather than a general advisory for the whole program.